The wives of lab leak
The wives of lab leak
It’s always the cover-up, never the crime
Did you know Gmail is subject to a FOIA request? U.S. Right to Know obtained access to Mrs. Toni Baric’s Gmail account. She is the wife of Dr Ralph Baric and fellow employee of UNC. She was the “Grants Specialist,” but her name has been removed from the administrative staff website. If DARPA Defuse was funded (it was) the grant will be in Toni’s inbox.
Mrs. Baric switched over to Gmail (above) just one week after USRTK issued its FOIA (below).
https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Baric-and-Daszak-gmail-020824.pdf
Mrs. Baric was the scheduling secretary for her husband Dr Ralph Baric. Mrs. Baric was cc’d on a lot of the cover up emails. The email below was shared among Ralph, Peter Daszak of EcoHealth, and Linfa Wang of Duke. They discussed signing a natural origins letter and distancing themselves from “our collaboration.”
The group of Baric, Daszak and Linfa in the early 2020 ‘collaboration’ was the same group in the 2018 DARPA Defuse document. A DARPA Defuse type contract will probably be found via FOIA in Toni Baric’s UNC inbox, but not her Gmail account.
Baric had previously called DARPA a “funny organization.” He noted “personal interactions are key.” In 2017, DARPA invited themselves onto the UNC campus. And then Ralph told Toni that they are a “persistent bunch.” But the same scientists (Ralph, Dani, Linfa, Daszak) appear on both DARPA Defuse and Fauci’s $82M CREID project. The CREID project was awarded in 2019 and was scheduled to begin in early 2020.
The Charlotte News & Observer gave us a glimpse into the Baric household.
After earning his doctorate in microbiology from N.C. State. Baric then moved across the country to do his postdoctoral work at the University of Southern California. That’s where he was introduced to two of the great loves in his life: his wife, Toni, and coronaviruses. Toni being the more important one, of course.
Toni loyally defended her husband’s coronavirus lab, saying “there’s no truth to any of it. He’s kind of getting hit, not just by trying to do good science, but all kinds of other negative things he has to deal with like conspiracy theories.” Toni apparently has a burner account on Twitter and monitors the lab leak news for her husband.
Early in the pandemic, Toni told Daszak that “we are kindred souls in this mess.” Her husband Ralph rambled about Remdesivir on CNN and Daszak replied “welcome to the Resistance.”
Ironically, the only reason USRTK knew about Toni’s Gmail account was because Daszak didn’t want to “get FoIA’d.” EcoHealth is the multi-million dollar non-profit with many NIAID and Pentagon biodefense contracts.
I did not know your personal Gmail account was subject to US FOIA laws, but if you are using it during official government business, it’s fair game.
The FOIA does not exempt those using private computers from the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act. If an e-mail meets the definition of “public record,” then it may be subject to the FOIA regardless of the location where the e-mail originated.
The other wives of lab leak
In a recent FOIA, we learned that Fauci doesn’t want his fingerprints on the origin stories. Fauci’s wife, Christine Grady, was well documented as the head of NIH Ethics and their household’s net worth is $11M.
Fauci also loved Montana more than money and traveled their often for business. His Rocky Mountain Lab scientists did not need a formal R01 grant to do research, since it’s an internal NIH lab. Fauci was apparently on the phone with Vincent Munster and wife Emmie de Wit by the “second week of January” 2020.
Emmie is a co-author and fellow employee at RML. She predicted the next big outbreak was going to be a coronavirus in November 2019. She also traveled to the Fauci funded Singapore bat conference in December 2019.
They are an outdoor loving couple. Hubby Vinnie blamed our fat Western diet for dying to his Dutch disease called Covid. Emmie was also testing Baric’s remdesivir on her RML monkeys in early 2020. Emmie said “we helped another group here to get the ChAdOx vaccine, that is now the AstraZeneca vaccine.” The results of her monkey test for Oxford were controversial.
Did The Oxford Covid Vaccine Work In Monkeys? Not Really
Emmie defended her husband’s study saying, “That was the main thing, of course, to see that the vaccine protects, but it was also a major safety question that they wanted to see addressed before moving into people. Vincent Munster's lab sent them the data which was an essential part of information, and the next day they started the trial in people. It was very important to do the whole process as quickly as possible, which is why we stepped in and helped.”
The husband and wife airborne team were both protégés of the infamous Ron Fouchier in the Netherlands. Their H5N1 ferret transmission methods were never published, but Emmie gave a clue during a TWIV interview. It’s by “getting as much virus in the upper respiratory tract as possible.” Does this sound familiar?
The TWIV podcasters were impressed (or suspicious?) with her preparedness for the pandemic. They quoted Baric’s criticism of the gain-of-function pause, since “you can have your moratorium, but nature doesn’t care and will keep progressing.” But if you pay close attention, Emmie was blaming Baric’s live attenuated bat vaccine, not her husband’s DARPA bat vaccine.
https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/colorado-state-university-documents-on-bat-pathogen-research/
Actually you have partially answered my question in a reply to another commenter:
"Ralph Baric’s approach is not vaccination. Rather his approach aims to boost the immune response against specific viral proteins (potentially to include innate immune response). Vaccination in bats not likely to work. Very limited antibodies from natural viral infection in bats. Viruses already common in bat population - not likely to challenge bat immune response with a vaccine"
Personally I can only see the bat vaccination concept as a deliberate attempt to create a zoonotic pandemic. Why does the virus need to be humanized to be an effective vaccine in bats (even if this bat vaccine is possible)? The bats are being infected with a virus that is exactly what the zoonoids fear is the danger.
I am unable to understand the concept of the bat vaccine.
1. Construct the humanized and FCS enabled synthetic transmissible vaccine.
2. Spray or inject a few bats which carry the vaccine into the general bat population
3. Antibodies to the virus are produced in the bat population.
What's next? Does the 'vaccine' disappear or does it remain in the bat population like all the other coronaviruses found in bats?
If the vaccine remains in the bat population as you would expect, therefore it is a prime candidate for zoonotic transfer, being humanized and highly transmissable.
Thus even if the lab leak did not occur, the net effect of this bat vaccination operation would be to create a zoonotic virus outbreak anyway. Otherwise why create the humanized and highly transmissible virus in the first place?