I've finished your excellent book. I've been following the origins debate off and on for a couple of years now and keeping an eye on Emily Kopp's work, but I was nowhere near having any complete narrative in my head. I believe you have solved it. Chapeau!
I trust you sent a copy to Ridley & Chan and RFK Jr, as you have gone beyond their books in this area. With RFK Jr, you may be able to get it in front of people who can change things in the hope that this will never happen again.
Thank you, Winston! Glad you get it because it's an easy-to-follow narrative about a complex subject. You're a fast reader because I haven't even received my "author copies" yet (not part of Prime shipping).
I'll send them a copy. Ridley understands the implications of SARS2 infecting Egyptian fruit bats. RFK Jr wants to fire the NIH. Please leave a review on Amazon since word of mouth is the best method for spreading the truth.
You might want to contact Cmdr. Charles Rixey https://prometheusshrugged.substack.com/ who was the guy who published the DEFUSE proposal 'leak' or 'find' to review this work. The more eyes on this story the better we can vet it.
This is some of the most important journalistic and criminal investigative work being done on the planet right now and Jim gets high praise from me at least.
Hi Jim- Reading a Jon Fleetwood article cross-posted by Dr. Jessica Rose today, I came across a segment quoting you:
"Researcher Jim Haslam has provided strong evidence that the goal of SARS-CoV2 gain-of-function research funded by the U.S. government was not merely to produce a virus, but to create a self-spreading COVID vaccine that acts like a virus.
"The virus-vaccine would infect individuals and transmit to others like any purported virus would do naturally.
"Haslam explained his theory in an interview with renowned internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough.
"Haslam argues the COVID pandemic virus “was the vaccine.”
'“I think we’re all scared of having to take the [COVID] vaccine. We didn’t want to take this experimental vaccine. Well, we took it already. What you thought was an infection was an inoculation. The spike protein of the mRNA vaccine is a mirror image of the spike protein of the COVID-19 virus,” Haslam told McCullough.
'“The one big difference is this one (the vaccine) comes from a needle and it goes in a body—this one (the virus-vaccine) is spread by aerosol.”
"You can watch Haslam’s statements to McCullough in a segment of the interview below....."
You probably already know these people but if you have not read these two recent, long posts, I think you will be interested. Although The present post of yours is the only one I have read so far, the Sirotkins' ideas appear to dovetail with yours.
Explains how a rapidly-mutating single strand rna virus could cause a global pandemic.
This is the team who was the first I know of, in February, 2020, to point to a lab origin.
I know these posts are long but well worth it. Only vaccine- reactivation virus is stable enough to permit large-scale epidemics.
Their theory of viral swarms is revolutionary and grounded.
I think we have the definitive explanation.
Unlike this team, however, I do not excuse anyone. Though I think they have the science right, I think they have the politics wrong.
Please read-- I know, they are long posts. Worth it. Thanks.
Agreed, Dan and I have come to the same conclusion except we disagree on one big part, he thinks Covid was an LAV for humans (involving the PLA and Uyghurs which aren't in Wuhan).
I know Covid was an LAV for bats since it infects and transmits in American lab bats (the US CDC confirmed in my book). Wuhan is an Eastern academic town where Western academics study live Chinese bats. Covid was a joint project between Duke, WIV, UNC, and RML based on this type of LAV contagious vaccine research:
Asking for a friend…could the scientist-academics, those who foisted this mass murder event on humankind, be hung in their academic robes, you know full, soulless, arrogant regalia?
Last chapter in the book: Was SARS2 a Planned Mistake or an Honest Academic Crime? I make the case for both, but here was the ringleader (too irrelevant to mention in book)
Sorry Jim but your dates appear to be wrong for instance R01AI110964 was granted by NIH to eco health from 2014 to 2019, ie this grant started before the DARPA grant application in 2018.
Sorry but since you can't read: "That grant was quietly renewed in July 2019 during (Trump's) administration—a $3.2 million investment by Fauci in Daszak’s DARPA Defuse project. The odd part of the 2019 R01 grant renewal was the inclusion of Ralph Baric of UNC—a high-dollar scientist attached to a relatively low-dollar subgrant to Wuhan. It was so odd it came up in Baric’s congressional testimony:
Committee: Did you have any conversations with Dr. Daszak regarding the termination?
Baric: I hadn't received any of the money to do anything on that grant yet when the termination notice hit. So he called and told me that the grant had been terminated and that the EcoHealth lawyers were looking into it. So I knew about it. But in terms of how that would impact my program, that was a very small component on that grant.
Committee: When did you get added to the grant?
Baric: After the first round. So it would have been the second round, I don’t know exactly. I can't remember.
Committee: So going into year 6?
Baric: It would have been going in -- if year 6 was around 2019 or 2020, that's when I would have been a part of it. My role was to study a couple of the viruses that the Wuhan Institute of Virology found that they were willing to share with me. So I always viewed that as not number one or number two on the list, maybe number five or number six on the list.
I've finished your excellent book. I've been following the origins debate off and on for a couple of years now and keeping an eye on Emily Kopp's work, but I was nowhere near having any complete narrative in my head. I believe you have solved it. Chapeau!
I trust you sent a copy to Ridley & Chan and RFK Jr, as you have gone beyond their books in this area. With RFK Jr, you may be able to get it in front of people who can change things in the hope that this will never happen again.
Thank you, Winston! Glad you get it because it's an easy-to-follow narrative about a complex subject. You're a fast reader because I haven't even received my "author copies" yet (not part of Prime shipping).
I'll send them a copy. Ridley understands the implications of SARS2 infecting Egyptian fruit bats. RFK Jr wants to fire the NIH. Please leave a review on Amazon since word of mouth is the best method for spreading the truth.
You might want to contact Cmdr. Charles Rixey https://prometheusshrugged.substack.com/ who was the guy who published the DEFUSE proposal 'leak' or 'find' to review this work. The more eyes on this story the better we can vet it.
This is some of the most important journalistic and criminal investigative work being done on the planet right now and Jim gets high praise from me at least.
agreed, covered some of that in post #5 https://jimhaslam.substack.com/p/5-one-professor-honorably-resigns
Hi Jim- Reading a Jon Fleetwood article cross-posted by Dr. Jessica Rose today, I came across a segment quoting you:
"Researcher Jim Haslam has provided strong evidence that the goal of SARS-CoV2 gain-of-function research funded by the U.S. government was not merely to produce a virus, but to create a self-spreading COVID vaccine that acts like a virus.
"The virus-vaccine would infect individuals and transmit to others like any purported virus would do naturally.
"Haslam explained his theory in an interview with renowned internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough.
"Haslam argues the COVID pandemic virus “was the vaccine.”
'“I think we’re all scared of having to take the [COVID] vaccine. We didn’t want to take this experimental vaccine. Well, we took it already. What you thought was an infection was an inoculation. The spike protein of the mRNA vaccine is a mirror image of the spike protein of the COVID-19 virus,” Haslam told McCullough.
'“The one big difference is this one (the vaccine) comes from a needle and it goes in a body—this one (the virus-vaccine) is spread by aerosol.”
"You can watch Haslam’s statements to McCullough in a segment of the interview below....."
Jessica Rose
Dec 29 · Unacceptable Jessica
"This is long, but important to consider."
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/drones-to-spray-self-spreading-covid
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You probably already know these people but if you have not read these two recent, long posts, I think you will be interested. Although The present post of yours is the only one I have read so far, the Sirotkins' ideas appear to dovetail with yours.
Explains how a rapidly-mutating single strand rna virus could cause a global pandemic.
This is the team who was the first I know of, in February, 2020, to point to a lab origin.
I know these posts are long but well worth it. Only vaccine- reactivation virus is stable enough to permit large-scale epidemics.
Their theory of viral swarms is revolutionary and grounded.
I think we have the definitive explanation.
Unlike this team, however, I do not excuse anyone. Though I think they have the science right, I think they have the politics wrong.
Please read-- I know, they are long posts. Worth it. Thanks.
Dr. Spruce
Links below:
https://harvard2thebighouse.com/p/sars-cov-2-is-the-most-dangerous……
https://harvard2thebighouse.com/p/part-ii-sars-cov-2-is-the-most-dangerous
Agreed, Dan and I have come to the same conclusion except we disagree on one big part, he thinks Covid was an LAV for humans (involving the PLA and Uyghurs which aren't in Wuhan).
I know Covid was an LAV for bats since it infects and transmits in American lab bats (the US CDC confirmed in my book). Wuhan is an Eastern academic town where Western academics study live Chinese bats. Covid was a joint project between Duke, WIV, UNC, and RML based on this type of LAV contagious vaccine research:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-020-1254-y
Asking for a friend…could the scientist-academics, those who foisted this mass murder event on humankind, be hung in their academic robes, you know full, soulless, arrogant regalia?
Last chapter in the book: Was SARS2 a Planned Mistake or an Honest Academic Crime? I make the case for both, but here was the ringleader (too irrelevant to mention in book)
https://jimhaslam.substack.com/p/lets-be-blunt-richard-ebright-helped
Sorry Jim but your dates appear to be wrong for instance R01AI110964 was granted by NIH to eco health from 2014 to 2019, ie this grant started before the DARPA grant application in 2018.
Sorry but since you can't read: "That grant was quietly renewed in July 2019 during (Trump's) administration—a $3.2 million investment by Fauci in Daszak’s DARPA Defuse project. The odd part of the 2019 R01 grant renewal was the inclusion of Ralph Baric of UNC—a high-dollar scientist attached to a relatively low-dollar subgrant to Wuhan. It was so odd it came up in Baric’s congressional testimony:
Committee: Did you have any conversations with Dr. Daszak regarding the termination?
Baric: I hadn't received any of the money to do anything on that grant yet when the termination notice hit. So he called and told me that the grant had been terminated and that the EcoHealth lawyers were looking into it. So I knew about it. But in terms of how that would impact my program, that was a very small component on that grant.
Committee: When did you get added to the grant?
Baric: After the first round. So it would have been the second round, I don’t know exactly. I can't remember.
Committee: So going into year 6?
Baric: It would have been going in -- if year 6 was around 2019 or 2020, that's when I would have been a part of it. My role was to study a couple of the viruses that the Wuhan Institute of Virology found that they were willing to share with me. So I always viewed that as not number one or number two on the list, maybe number five or number six on the list.