"I asked him to provide a biological explanation for why this Old World virus, called SARS2, loves New World lab animals, but he didn’t respond."
In the world of "bio-politics," the Haslam part of the Haslam-Sachs coalition represents the 'in vitro' part of the equation... holding back from directly connecting players and events to the wider agendas so clearly in operation to anyone who really wants to know 'what happened.' And that is how it should be. Sachs has shouldered the 'in vivo' part ... relating the real world actions of the genocidal maniacs in control of both American and Israeli policy decisions to the real world actions of pathologically criminal minds such as those of Fauci/Danzak/Baric/Munster et al. This way, Haslam's eye-opening work can't be easily slandered into nullity, and the reader can be invited to move at their own pace into a dot-connecting sequence which takes apart the motives of each careerist enabler one guilty glove at a time.
As the debate between Sweeny and Cleary so neatly shows, the resulting frisson is exactly what cross-pollinates the work here with the necessary 'wider lens' view that exposes the big picture which tptb have been so desperate to keep concealed. There is no 'paradox' in Sach's problematic relationship to CCP authority. He comes from a background redolent with the same folks who created and then guided that political movement for the entirety of Communist China's existence. And when 'chess pieces' like Lieber move east in accord with that very same agenda, it's nothing but a current expression of same.
Sach's allegiances are confusing but not impossible to discern. Like everyone in the mix, he's useful when fully comprehended. MERS & Ness Zion lab fit together like hand n glove. Haslam, the 'just another blogger' guy very much compares with "Rich Strike" the colt who came 'outta nowhere' to leave the rest of the field eating dust.
D614G. B.1 variant which led to B.1.1.529 aka Omicron or BA.1
It be interesting to see if any NA reservoir host species that started out without that mutation (WA1) naturally produced the same mutation in parallel since Baric theorized it might be a peculiar feature of SARS to mutate to. If not, then why not and is that more proof that an unnatural divergence from the WT SARS2 happened to set up the stage for an Omicron deployment? A no-see’em approach to leap phenotypes and make it look natural?
The debate is important…and your posts on Bostickson and LtCol Murphy were quite good.
But Sachs…really?
This is a biostrategically sensitve domain.
Can you at least acknowledge that Sachs is so supportive of Beijing and the Chinese Communist Party that almost every other person will be less supportive of the CCP dictatorship?
Can you at least understand that when I read your comments on Wuhan they simply read as direct from CCP Any-Where-But-Here-ism?
There are interesting bioinformatic points you raise, because it is a fascinating case study, but the forensic forms you propose, in direction and structure, just read as propaganda.
You are confusing the question of who and what he is with; why?
Why is he, and others, so supportive of Beijing and the CCP…I really do not know.
For me it is a mystery…even more so from a cultural and philosophical perspective.
I do not doubt the authenticity of his support for Beijing…if you do then he has been a less successful communicator of that support than I or he expected…Sachs does take every opportunity he gets to support far left communist ideology…even though it is a completely self refuting position for him to take.
My question is why?
Do you have any ideas?
Why, like most of the Catholic community involved with refugees support does he, and others, not see the terribly authoritarian aspects of the CCP?
The answer may well be in Detroit or some other part of middle America, sure, but what is it?
So this is politics then. You don’t like what Sachs represents in political spheres. This is not about the science and forensics of tracking down the origins of SARS2 then and using the paper trail of those involved but just politics. Good luck with that.
No…these are good points you make, the politics and other issues with bias are important…confirmation bias works in all directions, even me, even you…that is why we are given to each other in discussion and debate.
Here what I see time and again from Jim and certainly from Sach’s is a fervour for investigation of US authorities…which is fine…but there is no balance for what has been going on in Wuhan.
And I say this from engagement with people from Wuhan. There are many ways to interpret Shi’s statements and the one that Jim and Sach’s never seem to want to entertain is the idea of layers of CCP and PLA experimentation and involvement.
The CIVMIL fusion that has taken place since 2016 is very unpopular within these areas of dual use research of concern.
<<Not in my lab>> is a very courageous indicator from Shi while obviously under duress that there are labs within the PLA system that regularly copy US Military Dual Use Research of Concern for obvious and strategic bio weapons defence reasons.
That Beijing had access to ALL of the US systems and grant proposals it wanted is not at all in question…the cyberbiosecurity of the US is hopelessly inadequate.
Even Drosten here is saying that given a proposal existed for DEFUSE type experiments there was every chance these would be conducted by covert bioweapons programs linked to Wuhan Institute of Virology…why would they not?
It makes perfect sense strategically.
The covert and overt bioinformatic signals need to be taken into consideration.
Is it possible that China (PLA researchers) saw the lucrative opportunity in bat research on their soil - even building a BSL4 lab - to host international experiments like Linfa Wang’s Duke Singapore Horseshoe bat colony because of their access to the bats’ ecosystem in SE Asia? Follow the money rather than the politics of bioweapons. All this CCP bullshit is just a distraction from why Wuhan in the first place - bats.
Drosten is actually trying to convince a court in Munich of his incompetence as an expert - for liability reasons: https://substack.com/@drbinesverbalesvitriol/note/p-204413360?r=31oy60
Prison ,Please .
"I asked him to provide a biological explanation for why this Old World virus, called SARS2, loves New World lab animals, but he didn’t respond."
In the world of "bio-politics," the Haslam part of the Haslam-Sachs coalition represents the 'in vitro' part of the equation... holding back from directly connecting players and events to the wider agendas so clearly in operation to anyone who really wants to know 'what happened.' And that is how it should be. Sachs has shouldered the 'in vivo' part ... relating the real world actions of the genocidal maniacs in control of both American and Israeli policy decisions to the real world actions of pathologically criminal minds such as those of Fauci/Danzak/Baric/Munster et al. This way, Haslam's eye-opening work can't be easily slandered into nullity, and the reader can be invited to move at their own pace into a dot-connecting sequence which takes apart the motives of each careerist enabler one guilty glove at a time.
As the debate between Sweeny and Cleary so neatly shows, the resulting frisson is exactly what cross-pollinates the work here with the necessary 'wider lens' view that exposes the big picture which tptb have been so desperate to keep concealed. There is no 'paradox' in Sach's problematic relationship to CCP authority. He comes from a background redolent with the same folks who created and then guided that political movement for the entirety of Communist China's existence. And when 'chess pieces' like Lieber move east in accord with that very same agenda, it's nothing but a current expression of same.
Sach's allegiances are confusing but not impossible to discern. Like everyone in the mix, he's useful when fully comprehended. MERS & Ness Zion lab fit together like hand n glove. Haslam, the 'just another blogger' guy very much compares with "Rich Strike" the colt who came 'outta nowhere' to leave the rest of the field eating dust.
Interesting horse racing analogy at the end!
D614G. B.1 variant which led to B.1.1.529 aka Omicron or BA.1
It be interesting to see if any NA reservoir host species that started out without that mutation (WA1) naturally produced the same mutation in parallel since Baric theorized it might be a peculiar feature of SARS to mutate to. If not, then why not and is that more proof that an unnatural divergence from the WT SARS2 happened to set up the stage for an Omicron deployment? A no-see’em approach to leap phenotypes and make it look natural?
The debate is important…and your posts on Bostickson and LtCol Murphy were quite good.
But Sachs…really?
This is a biostrategically sensitve domain.
Can you at least acknowledge that Sachs is so supportive of Beijing and the Chinese Communist Party that almost every other person will be less supportive of the CCP dictatorship?
Can you at least understand that when I read your comments on Wuhan they simply read as direct from CCP Any-Where-But-Here-ism?
There are interesting bioinformatic points you raise, because it is a fascinating case study, but the forensic forms you propose, in direction and structure, just read as propaganda.
Sorry.
Please try again.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeffrey-d-sachs_this-summer-i-invite-you-to-join-me-on-the-activity-7470132594387337216-7dII?utm_medium=ios_app&rcm=ACoAABR1ro0B0loTmAqQEJwLUSBzGcw5xe0O-5w&utm_source=social_share_send&utm_campaign=copy_link
Jeffrey Sachs = PLA agitator? Please. Better to attack him for his thick Detroit accent (grew up in Oak Park).
When you hear him talk that’s how the boomer generation sounds around here - a real Middle America son.
You are confusing the question of who and what he is with; why?
Why is he, and others, so supportive of Beijing and the CCP…I really do not know.
For me it is a mystery…even more so from a cultural and philosophical perspective.
I do not doubt the authenticity of his support for Beijing…if you do then he has been a less successful communicator of that support than I or he expected…Sachs does take every opportunity he gets to support far left communist ideology…even though it is a completely self refuting position for him to take.
My question is why?
Do you have any ideas?
Why, like most of the Catholic community involved with refugees support does he, and others, not see the terribly authoritarian aspects of the CCP?
The answer may well be in Detroit or some other part of middle America, sure, but what is it?
I have no clue.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/apr/21/student-allegedly-jailed-china-after-pro-democracy-protests-australia
So this is politics then. You don’t like what Sachs represents in political spheres. This is not about the science and forensics of tracking down the origins of SARS2 then and using the paper trail of those involved but just politics. Good luck with that.
No…these are good points you make, the politics and other issues with bias are important…confirmation bias works in all directions, even me, even you…that is why we are given to each other in discussion and debate.
Here what I see time and again from Jim and certainly from Sach’s is a fervour for investigation of US authorities…which is fine…but there is no balance for what has been going on in Wuhan.
And I say this from engagement with people from Wuhan. There are many ways to interpret Shi’s statements and the one that Jim and Sach’s never seem to want to entertain is the idea of layers of CCP and PLA experimentation and involvement.
The CIVMIL fusion that has taken place since 2016 is very unpopular within these areas of dual use research of concern.
<<Not in my lab>> is a very courageous indicator from Shi while obviously under duress that there are labs within the PLA system that regularly copy US Military Dual Use Research of Concern for obvious and strategic bio weapons defence reasons.
That Beijing had access to ALL of the US systems and grant proposals it wanted is not at all in question…the cyberbiosecurity of the US is hopelessly inadequate.
Even Drosten here is saying that given a proposal existed for DEFUSE type experiments there was every chance these would be conducted by covert bioweapons programs linked to Wuhan Institute of Virology…why would they not?
It makes perfect sense strategically.
The covert and overt bioinformatic signals need to be taken into consideration.
Is it possible that China (PLA researchers) saw the lucrative opportunity in bat research on their soil - even building a BSL4 lab - to host international experiments like Linfa Wang’s Duke Singapore Horseshoe bat colony because of their access to the bats’ ecosystem in SE Asia? Follow the money rather than the politics of bioweapons. All this CCP bullshit is just a distraction from why Wuhan in the first place - bats.