Weekly lab leak news
Fauci's defense, FOIA's, Germans in Montana & MTA's
Fauci is practicing his defense
Fauci settled into his sweet retirement gig at Georgetown University in Washington D.C. He appears to be studying for a Georgetown law degree, because he is already presenting his “biodefense.” And it appears he will use a “wide host range” as an alibi for his Montana lab. It’s not going to work since the list of SARS2 transmission models are narrow but deep (i.e. American mink, American deer, American deer mice, American lab bats).
Fauci won’t mention what type of bat is a “reservoir” for SARS2, but he discussed the variants above and referenced the Wuhan wet market papers below. He also funded and coordinated the distribution of these wet market papers in last week’s FOIA.
According to Fauci, we are living in an “era of a normalization of untruths,” so science and democracy “may fall apart.”
The many noble lies of Fauci were well documented, but the SARS2 origin won’t be one.
FOIA for Fauci’s assistant
https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/USRTK-Prod-3-03.11.24.doj-nih.pdf
U.S. Right to Know released a FOIA for Fauci’s longtime assistant, David Morens. He recently gave closed door testimony to Congress. He also pays very close attention to the lab leak news and forwards the articles to an interesting list of suspects. He included Peter Daszak of EcoHealth, Linfa Wang of Duke and Gerald Keusch of Boston’s BSL4. All three were on the NIAID CREID grant awarded in November 2019 by Fauci.
Morens also forwarded a Newsweek article where DARPA denied funding Defuse.
Morens asked some detailed 2016 questions about live bat emissions or “bloom.” And it also sounds like Peter Daszak pays for the expensive Washington D.C. hotel rooms for Science reporters like Jon Cohen.
A Bloomberg reporter, Jason Gale, sent a draft of his lab leak article to David Morens and copied Bob Garry of Tulane.
A 2015 email including Ralph Baric and wife Toni with Vincent Munster. They discussed a coronavirus workshop looking for animal models and included mink (SARS2 transmission model).
Morens and Fauci previously blamed SARS2 emergence on “human behavior,” while Morens and Peter Daszak claimed the earth was too “crowded.”
Vincent Munster bat vaccine video
Connections between Germany and Montana
connects the dots between Germany, Wuhan and Montana’s BSL4.“The Americans did it, of course. Or “we did“, as Jim Haslam, the American Substacker who has developed the most elaborate version of this theory, has put it: Anthony Fauci, the funder of the research; Ralph Baric, the ‘designer’ of the virus; and Peter Daszak, the albeit British head of U.S.-based EcoHealth Alliance, who directed the research. They merely needed a little help from one hired-gun Dutch virologist in the person of Vincent Munster, who made Baric’s virus transmissible at Fauci’s Rocky Mountain Lab in Montana before it was shipped to Wuhan. And the rest is history. But what about all the German connections to virus research in Wuhan?”
Rocky Mountain Lab in Montana has something for everyone: Australians, Brits, Germans, Dutch, Fauci, prion research, “mini-brains” grown on stem cells, Egyptian fruit bats kidnapped from local zoos, deer, deer sized cages, disposable underwear, etc.
Rootclaim recruited judges from Reddit
The lab leak debate was banned on Reddit during the pandemic, but it was always alive and well on Twitter. It’s therefore surprising the Rootclaim organizers recruited the two judges from Reddit, so they lost their own $100,000 bet. But many great counterpoints were raised during the debate, including the red herring called the Wuhan Institute of Virology database.
Ralph Baric’s postdoc, Vineet Menachery now at UTMB, was still studying those WIV samples from that particular Chinese cave in April 2019. He noted “our (UNC) work highlights the idea that the emergence of viruses is more complicated than receptor binding alone.” Menachery was referencing an upcoming paper that was about to be published in September 2019. It used RXXR as a furin cleavage motif and SARS2 used RRAR.
Science survey says!
Only 25% of UK scientists believe in lab leak.
A US based ‘superforcasters’ survey said the same.
https://goodjudgment.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Superforecasters-Covid-Origin-20240311.pdf
But George Gao, former head of China’s CDC, said “don’t rule out anything.” If you pay close attention to the East-West info wars, the Chinese virologists are professionally pointing a finger at Fauci.
Shanghai paper challenges a Fauci funded paper
There were three early variants circulating in Wuhan in early 2020. The WA1 variant collected in Wuhan, but isolated in Seattle is the oldest (ancestral) of the three. Fauci’s army of well paid virologists found a way to turn the lab leak debate into lineage A versus B. They claimed both lineages spilled over in the Wuhan wet market. It’s basically a double spillover theory, but the reason was to explain away the lack of lineage A (ancestral) found at the Wuhan wet market.
Dr Yong-Zhen Zhang lab in Shanghai just published never before seen sequences, collected in Jan-Feb 2020 timeline, which show lineage B evolved from lineage A.
https://academic.oup.com/ve/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ve/veae020/7619252?login=false
Dr Zhang’s lab in Shanghai actually uploaded the SARS2 genome (Wuhan-HU-1 or lineage B) to the NIH database called Genbank on Jan 5, 2020, which was one week before it was officially released. It was claimed that Zhang’s lab was shut down because of this overt act, but he is still publishing incriminating information. Shi’s partial copy of RaTG13 was also uploaded to Genbank in 2018, but not released until 2022.
217 mRNA injections?
A report on a hypervaccinated individual from Magdeburg Germany received 217 vaccinations within 29 months against SARS-CoV-2. Maybe he was selling vaccine passports?
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(24)00134-8/fulltext
I’m not familiar with the lineage A vs B story - could you provide a quick synopsis? Does one derive from the other or are they both descendants of something else. Which sequence was the PCR based on? Which was used for the first vaccines? Are they different enough to account for different behaviours in patients - was one more likely to be the cause of the seriously ill in New York, Bergamo, Iran and the other more likely to be the weird ‘make me move like a sloth’ with other symptoms thing that I had in Nov/Dec’19 and so many other people survived unscathed?
Also, do you have any opinion on where the omicrons came from?
Thanks.
Jim keep connecting the dots. We appreciate it 😃
Question for you. Have you ever looked into the UPMC lab researcher studying coronaviruses who was murdered in what they said was a murder suicide in May 2020?
Seems very random and timing does not look good. Seems like there could be more to it. Figured I would ask since you usually get to the bottom of everything