Agreed, but CREID ($82 million) and global virome projects ($200+ million) show how much money these virologists were chasing. And it's why they are covering this up.
Jim this is truly amazing work. Your analysis is extremely convincing and your book and interviews have been a breakthrough.
One question: could you already discuss your theory with Dani Anderson? Can she prove she worked on Ebola at WIV or can you prove she didn't? Do we know for sure Dani lived and isolated in the Wuchang dormitory?
And another question: you suggest WA1 was one of the earliest variants not only in the USA but in Wuhan, caught by a Chinese man who traveled back to the USA, while the Wuhan market variants were somewhat later variants, correct? This would answer a lot of questions.
Thanks for reading Ryan and for your pointed questions. Dani won't communicate with me, but her former Duke colleague did. I asked if she ever worked on any Ebola research and he didn't provide any references. I went through her 100-paper CV and found nothing. To her credit, in Feb 2020, she told an NBC reporter she worked on coronavirus and live bats.
She then went quiet, and my assumption is Duke asked her to claim Ebola research for a Bloomberg interview in July 2021. She told Bloomberg she caught the BSL4 bus at the Chinese Academy of Science (next door to the Wuchang campus/dorm). In 2022, she gave an internal presentation about her time in Wuhan:
Yes, regarding WA1, it's the oldest known strain, according to everyone, but only by 3 nucleotides out of 30,000. Also called proCoV2, WA1 is older than Lineage A & B in the wet market. It's the key to the entire story, so I'm glad you get it.
You really pieced it together Jim. Many have tried it but you did it. Truly masterful.
Do you think the Wuhan Military World Games Oct 18-27 2019 were already a super-spreader event? It's a bit early but there were reports many athletes felt sick. I found it strange this was never seriously investigated through antibody tests or whatever.
Anyway I wish you a happy New Year. 2025 is going to be very interesting for sure!
I will adopt your theory, it was a superspreader event. It was scheduled in 2017, so it's the greatest coincidence in history. The stadium is 1/2 between BSL2 and BSL4 along Dani's bus route. This is the best early outbreak evidence I found, Covid antibodies in Norweigan women and West Coast blood donors by Dec 2019:
You will find Ebola referenced in the CREID bid, which Dani edited in June 2019. e.g., "Commented [DA82]: Can we cut out some of the very specific CoV details? Especially the recombination (which filo and paramyxo don’t do)."
In other words, Dani was trying to make their DARPA Defuse bid II less SARS-centric. But this same FOIA doc also has Baric's "furin cleavage site"
Yes, but I prefer the word scapegoat. That's why Baric, Fauci, Daszak, etc are covering up a Wuhan lab leak. Wuhan was the Western academic playground for live Chinese bat research.
No, but the Jan 10 email is crazy. Munster congratulates Baric for creating such a novel genome that it can't be traced back to them. It's the "smoke stick" from April 2020 and discussed in Chapters 2, 8 & 28. It shows a Wuhan BSL4 technician could have been infected by changing the HEPA filters in Dani's BSL4:
"Early in the pandemic, Colorado State University researchers used a smoke stick in their BSL3 to observe airflow patterns. They discovered that air traveled from the HEPA-filtered ceiling down to the lab floor, then back up along the wall behind the bat cages before exiting through the exhaust HEPA filter located on the ceiling. This airflow inadvertently carried Covid from inoculated Egyptian fruit bat cages up to the negative control cage. As a result, all three control bats, housed in a separate cage ABOVE the inoculated bats, became infected."
Dany, there are multiple pathways for something that contagious to get out (broken ventilation system, infected coworker, broken HEPA filter, etc). Chapter 2 discussed the "smoke stick" email, and Covid could float from the infected bats down to the CSU lab floor and infect the bats in a separate cage ABOVE the experimental bats. Munster cranked up the infectious dial to win the grant.
Dani is adamant she wasn't sick, and I believe her. I've sent that smoking gun email to both her and Linfa to let them know this isn't their fault. I've put that email in front of scientists, who agree she is a victim put in an impossible position. But needlesticks happen often and Covid would have leaked from a BSL5.
Jim I had a look at Daszak's CREID proposal (EID-SEARCH). In contrast to his DARPA/DEFUSE proposal, it appears his NIH proposal wasn't about vaccines and virus engineering. Also, it appears this proposal wasn't funded or even accepted by late 2019. Do you agree or did I miss something?
Good questions Richard. It's easier to see in my book with the tables comparing TA1 to R01 and TA2 to U01, but there is a reference to live bat infections:
World law enforcement agencies must arrest Baric, Walensky, Birx, Fauci, Daszak and all DOD, CIA, CDC, NIH, WHO, FDA, HHS and big pharma and big tech. executives involved.
Fraud and homicide are ...not included in the total immunity from legal liability agreement under the PREP Act for the big Pharma criminals!
Nuremberg Code and RICO laws apply now! The DOJ better wake the Fk Up and get busy!
Thank you so much, you did an amazing job. However, CREID and global virome projects are to force a scapegoat?
Agreed, but CREID ($82 million) and global virome projects ($200+ million) show how much money these virologists were chasing. And it's why they are covering this up.
That is a huge money, much more than enough for the unsuccessful preparedness of pandemic.
Did they stop funding those projects yet?
Jim this is truly amazing work. Your analysis is extremely convincing and your book and interviews have been a breakthrough.
One question: could you already discuss your theory with Dani Anderson? Can she prove she worked on Ebola at WIV or can you prove she didn't? Do we know for sure Dani lived and isolated in the Wuchang dormitory?
And another question: you suggest WA1 was one of the earliest variants not only in the USA but in Wuhan, caught by a Chinese man who traveled back to the USA, while the Wuhan market variants were somewhat later variants, correct? This would answer a lot of questions.
Thanks for reading Ryan and for your pointed questions. Dani won't communicate with me, but her former Duke colleague did. I asked if she ever worked on any Ebola research and he didn't provide any references. I went through her 100-paper CV and found nothing. To her credit, in Feb 2020, she told an NBC reporter she worked on coronavirus and live bats.
https://x.com/RichardEngel/status/1232788541010137088
She then went quiet, and my assumption is Duke asked her to claim Ebola research for a Bloomberg interview in July 2021. She told Bloomberg she caught the BSL4 bus at the Chinese Academy of Science (next door to the Wuchang campus/dorm). In 2022, she gave an internal presentation about her time in Wuhan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syJ7O0Ph6Lg&t=16655s
Yes, regarding WA1, it's the oldest known strain, according to everyone, but only by 3 nucleotides out of 30,000. Also called proCoV2, WA1 is older than Lineage A & B in the wet market. It's the key to the entire story, so I'm glad you get it.
You really pieced it together Jim. Many have tried it but you did it. Truly masterful.
Do you think the Wuhan Military World Games Oct 18-27 2019 were already a super-spreader event? It's a bit early but there were reports many athletes felt sick. I found it strange this was never seriously investigated through antibody tests or whatever.
Anyway I wish you a happy New Year. 2025 is going to be very interesting for sure!
Happy 2025 Ryan!
I will adopt your theory, it was a superspreader event. It was scheduled in 2017, so it's the greatest coincidence in history. The stadium is 1/2 between BSL2 and BSL4 along Dani's bus route. This is the best early outbreak evidence I found, Covid antibodies in Norweigan women and West Coast blood donors by Dec 2019:
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/12/e1004/6012472?login=false
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/prevalence-of-antibodies-against-sarscov2-among-pregnant-women-in-norway-during-the-period-december-2019-through-december-2020/0178544CC4F04FC0A55C7B0BD5F28AB8
You will find Ebola referenced in the CREID bid, which Dani edited in June 2019. e.g., "Commented [DA82]: Can we cut out some of the very specific CoV details? Especially the recombination (which filo and paramyxo don’t do)."
In other words, Dani was trying to make their DARPA Defuse bid II less SARS-centric. But this same FOIA doc also has Baric's "furin cleavage site"
https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Q1-Broder-3rd-round-combined.pdf
Are they trying to use covid pandemic to frame chinese?
Yes, but I prefer the word scapegoat. That's why Baric, Fauci, Daszak, etc are covering up a Wuhan lab leak. Wuhan was the Western academic playground for live Chinese bat research.
https://jimhaslam.substack.com/p/2-why-did-the-batman-fly-into-wuhan
What is precisely the smoking gun e-mail ?
- the one where Daszak explains how DEFUSE grant request content is being recycled to document CREID request ?
- the one, on Jan, 10th 2020 where Munster congratulates Baric for his accurate forecast of the SARS virus eventually merging ?
No, but the Jan 10 email is crazy. Munster congratulates Baric for creating such a novel genome that it can't be traced back to them. It's the "smoke stick" from April 2020 and discussed in Chapters 2, 8 & 28. It shows a Wuhan BSL4 technician could have been infected by changing the HEPA filters in Dani's BSL4:
"Early in the pandemic, Colorado State University researchers used a smoke stick in their BSL3 to observe airflow patterns. They discovered that air traveled from the HEPA-filtered ceiling down to the lab floor, then back up along the wall behind the bat cages before exiting through the exhaust HEPA filter located on the ceiling. This airflow inadvertently carried Covid from inoculated Egyptian fruit bat cages up to the negative control cage. As a result, all three control bats, housed in a separate cage ABOVE the inoculated bats, became infected."
Jim,
If Dani A had no needle incident to trigger the pandemics in Wuhan, what would be an alternative scenario ?
Dany, there are multiple pathways for something that contagious to get out (broken ventilation system, infected coworker, broken HEPA filter, etc). Chapter 2 discussed the "smoke stick" email, and Covid could float from the infected bats down to the CSU lab floor and infect the bats in a separate cage ABOVE the experimental bats. Munster cranked up the infectious dial to win the grant.
Dani is adamant she wasn't sick, and I believe her. I've sent that smoking gun email to both her and Linfa to let them know this isn't their fault. I've put that email in front of scientists, who agree she is a victim put in an impossible position. But needlesticks happen often and Covid would have leaked from a BSL5.
Jim I had a look at Daszak's CREID proposal (EID-SEARCH). In contrast to his DARPA/DEFUSE proposal, it appears his NIH proposal wasn't about vaccines and virus engineering. Also, it appears this proposal wasn't funded or even accepted by late 2019. Do you agree or did I miss something?
Good questions Richard. It's easier to see in my book with the tables comparing TA1 to R01 and TA2 to U01, but there is a reference to live bat infections:
https://x.com/jhas5/status/1748903855255916555
The CREID grant (U01) also includes the same Defuse personnel (Anderson, Wang, Baric):
https://x.com/jhas5/status/1600330224398487552
Daszak bid in June 2019, and stated Fauci would award by November:
https://x.com/jhas5/status/1857788503683104899
Fauci edited an EcoHealth bat vaccine paper on Jan 8, 2020:
https://x.com/jhas5/status/1840034814826594451
Baric included the furin cleavage site during the CREID draft in June 2019:
https://x.com/jhas5/status/1859384450347307331
Search "Danielle" or "DA" to see how she turned the SARS-centric Defuse bid into a broader CREID bid for NIH approval:
https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Q1-Broder-3rd-round-combined.pdf
World law enforcement agencies must arrest Baric, Walensky, Birx, Fauci, Daszak and all DOD, CIA, CDC, NIH, WHO, FDA, HHS and big pharma and big tech. executives involved.
Fraud and homicide are ...not included in the total immunity from legal liability agreement under the PREP Act for the big Pharma criminals!
Nuremberg Code and RICO laws apply now! The DOJ better wake the Fk Up and get busy!
— AIRE — !!! — BREATHE …!!! ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️
T R U T H •••• … !!!
‼️‼️‼️‼️—- F I N A L L Y … ‼️‼️‼️‼️🎶🎶🎶🎵— LIGHT …!!!!!! … “T H E
W A A A Y “ … !!!! 👀👀👀👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️👁️👁️
UT ! OH …!!!!
“CUT THROAT” —- FORMALITY …..?????? ♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️🎩🎩🎩♨️♨️♨️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️🥸😎🧐🤨😝😝😝😝😜🤨🙂↕️
- IT’ S A L W A Y S W A R IN THE CONGRESSIONAL —
“ HEARINGS “ ••• “N O T”
????? ?????? ??????
“ THE R U L E S “ … ARE NOT — ACQUAINTED WITH “ THE TRUTH “ — 🥸😎🤓🧐🤨😔😣😖😫😠😡😤
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!