Predictably, Trump permits GOF to go on in the USA but suspends such activities outside. The mainstream completely misrepresents the situation by emphasising the cessation of GOF.
Why would the head of NIAID have a portrait of Brando as The Godfather hanging behind him? That indicates a form of delinquency. If accurate, this story is truly remarkable. Stunning.
I wonder if you could bring this article to the attention of Jeffrey Tucker of the Brownestone Institute. He was interviewed by James Kunstler a few weeks ago, and expressed an interest in the lab origins, but was admittedly fuzzy on the details. Didn't seem to have even an inkling of RML for example. But here you are with the timelines, players, and receipts. I think the lawyer in him might appreciate it, and perhaps he could help your work reach a wider audience.
Huh. Maybe his professed fuzziness in the interview was just a matter of not knowing who to listen to? (Maybe I even heard of your substack via Brownestone, who knows? I've read that article where you were mentioned, but it all went into the melting pot of my conceptual understanding :)
At any rate, maybe the general fuzziness will start to resolve now, as so many former speculations (like the renaming trick) are now traceable, thanks to your relentless pursuit of the truth. Thank you.
Great work; lots to ponder over. And The University of Novel Coronaviruses - priceless! :D
Excellent !
Predictably, Trump permits GOF to go on in the USA but suspends such activities outside. The mainstream completely misrepresents the situation by emphasising the cessation of GOF.
Why would the head of NIAID have a portrait of Brando as The Godfather hanging behind him? That indicates a form of delinquency. If accurate, this story is truly remarkable. Stunning.
I wonder if you could bring this article to the attention of Jeffrey Tucker of the Brownestone Institute. He was interviewed by James Kunstler a few weeks ago, and expressed an interest in the lab origins, but was admittedly fuzzy on the details. Didn't seem to have even an inkling of RML for example. But here you are with the timelines, players, and receipts. I think the lawyer in him might appreciate it, and perhaps he could help your work reach a wider audience.
this is a touchy subject, and Tucker received hate mail from a US scientist (about me) when he ran this article:
https://brownstone.org/articles/is-this-the-man-who-created-covid-19-in-faucis-us-lab/
For more on the 3 year background of this internal fight/debate:
https://jimhaslam.substack.com/p/book-references
Huh. Maybe his professed fuzziness in the interview was just a matter of not knowing who to listen to? (Maybe I even heard of your substack via Brownestone, who knows? I've read that article where you were mentioned, but it all went into the melting pot of my conceptual understanding :)
At any rate, maybe the general fuzziness will start to resolve now, as so many former speculations (like the renaming trick) are now traceable, thanks to your relentless pursuit of the truth. Thank you.